Practical mysticism in Islam and Christianity: a comparative study of Jalal al-Din Rumi and Meister Eckhart
Practical mysticism in Islam and Christianity: a comparative study of Jalal al-Din Rumi and Meister Eckhart
复制标题
伊斯兰教和基督教中的实用神秘主义：贾拉勒·丁·鲁米和梅斯特·埃克哈特的比较研究
DOI：
10.1080/20465726.2017.1403672
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
0.2
通讯作者：
Vinzent M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vinzent M
标题的读者可能会惊讶地发现Meister Eckhart与Jalal al-Din Rumi一起比较他们的“实用神秘主义”。不仅是一些学者强烈抵制在神秘主义者中看到埃克哈特（人们只需要想想波鸿学派），而且更特别的是，几乎所有埃克哈特的读者都会同意，他的实践神秘主义远不如他的智力神秘主义突出。赛义德·扎拉比-扎德知道这一点，他清楚地阐述了这些问题，权衡并解释了为什么他把埃克哈特读成一个神秘主义者，并强调正是埃克哈特神秘主义的智力本质允许他与鲁米进行对比。因此，整本书分为两大部分。在介绍之后，我们给出了第一部分关于“埃克哈特的实践
The reader of the title might be surprised to find Meister Eckhart being brought together with Jalal al-Din Rumi in a comparison of their ‘practical mysticism’. Not only was there a strong resistance of some scholars of seeing Eckhart amongst mystics (one only needs to think of the Bochum school), but more particularly because almost all readers of Eckhart will agree that his practical mysticism is by far less prominent than his intellectual one. Saeed Zarrabi-Zadeh knows it. He spells the problems out clearly, weighs and explains why he reads Eckhart as a mystic and underlines that it is precisely the intellectual nature of Eckhart’s mysticism that allowed for a contrasting comparison with Rumi. The entire book, then, is structured into two major parts. After an introduction we are given the first part on ‘Eckhart’s practical