Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of securitisation theory
Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of securitisation theory
复制标题
安全与语境问题：对安全化理论的诠释学批判
DOI：
10.1017/s0260210509008535
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
F. Ciutǎ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Ciutǎ
当我们在处理安全问题时，我们如何知道？这是安全研究中的一个基本问题，证券化理论提供了一个权威但不完整的答案，主要是因为它排除了安全的含义可能因环境而异。为了克服这一限制，我们需要一种以安全作为理论和政策之间的范畴的有限性为中心的解释学视角，它为实证研究提供了更精确的算法。安全的语境解释学表明，即使在缺乏统一的规范宣言的情况下，规范意识也是必要的，也面临着那些反对其意义潜在的无限扩展的人所唤起的“安全之死”的幽灵。
Abstract How do we know when we are dealing with security issue? This is a cardinal question in Security Studies, and securitisation theory provides and authoritative yet incomplete answer, mainly because it rules out that the meaning of security can vary contextually. To overcome this limitation, we need a hermeneutical perspective centred on the liminality of security as a category in-between theory and policy, which produces a more precise algorithm for empirical research. A contextual hermeneutics of security signals that normative awareness is necessary even in the absence of a unifying normative manifesto, also confronts the spectre of the “death of security” invoked by those who object to the potentially endless broadening of its meaning.