Are Performance Differences between Family and Non-Family Smes Uniform Across All Firm Sizes?
Are Performance Differences between Family and Non-Family Smes Uniform Across All Firm Sizes?
复制标题
所有规模的企业中家族企业和非家族中小企业的绩效差异是否一致？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Kotey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Kotey
目的-本研究的目的是检验企业规模对家族和非家族中小企业（SMEs）绩效（以利润、增长、效率和流动性衡量）差异的影响。设计/方法/方法-将441家家族企业和473家非家族企业的样本分为四个规模组，并使用方差分析分析每个规模组的绩效差异。研究结果-研究结果表明，家庭中小企业的表现至少与非家庭中小企业一样好。虽然这两类公司在小层面上有几个相似的绩效特征，但某些差异是明显的。家族型中小企业与非家族型中小企业的绩效差异在关键成长阶段（20‐49名员工）变得突出，在50‐99名员工时达到最佳，此后再次缩小。对于家族企业来说，在员工超过100人之后，高毛利率和有效利用资产的好处开始减弱，但员工绩效较低的缺点仍在继续。
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of firm size on performance (measured as profits, growth, efficiency and liquidity) differences between family and non‐family small‐ to medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs).Design/methodology/approach – The samples of 441 family and 473 non‐family firms were divided into four size groups and performance differences analysed for each size group using MANOVA.Findings – The findings indicate that family SMEs perform at least as well as non‐family SMEs. Although the two types of firms shared several similar performance characteristics at the small level, certain differences were evident. Performance differences between family and non‐family SMEs became prominent at the critical growth phase (20‐49 employees), reached an optimum at 50‐99 employees and narrowed again thereafter. For family firms, the benefits of higher gross margins and efficient use of assets began to wane after 100 plus employees but the disadvantages of lower employee performance contin...