The Itinerary to Explore Headwaters of the New Left’s Cultural Studies
The Itinerary to Explore Headwaters of the New Left’s Cultural Studies
复制标题
新左派文化研究源头探寻之旅
DOI：
10.1080/09523367.2017.1381599
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Keiko Ikeda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sakai Shogo;Maeda Noriaki;Sasadai Junpei;Kotoshiba Somu;Anami Keitaro;Tashiro Tsubasa;Fujishita Hironori;Urabe Yukio;Keiko Ikeda
20世纪80年代是休闲研究的学术潮流催生体育史研究的时期。日本在这一学术潮流中并不是后来者。更重要的是，文化问题不再是社会现象的一部分，而是阶级融合和阶级斗争的关键问题。在完成了关于皮尔斯·埃根的博士论文之后，我的注意力转向了为什么要研究体育史的问题。新左派认为，“不了解人们的文化状况，阶级问题就无法真正理解”。体育新闻业的兴起也有类似的命运。这一结果似乎是19世纪早期激进派对大众文化的关注和20世纪新左派对文化研究的兴趣之间的同步闪光。激进的散文家和当代学者之所以要关注一个社会中带有批判性思维的“文化转向”，是有明显原因的。
The 1980s was a period when the academic current for leisure studies led to the birth of the study of sports history. Japan was not a latecomer in this scholarly stream. More significantly, cultural issues were thought not the part of various phenomena in a society, but the key issues for class integration and class strife. After writing my PhD thesis on Pierce Egan, one of the earliest sport journalists influenced by the idea of early radicals in the nineteenth-century Britain, my attention turned over to the question of why the study of sport history was necessary. There was the academic impact inherited from the New Left’s belief that ‘without understanding the state of people’s culture, class issues are unable to be truly comprehended’. The Initiation of sport journalism had a similar destiny. This consequence appears to be a synchroflash between the early radicals’ concern in popular culture in the nineteenth century and the New Left’s interest in cultural studies in the twentieth century. There was an obvious reason why the radical essayists and contemporary academics had to pay attention to the ‘cultural turn’ with critical thinking in a society.