Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol.
Translating caring competencies to remote working environments: a systematic review protocol.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048459
复制
发表时间：
2021-05-19
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Paolucci EO
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nowell L;Lorenzetti D;Jacobsen M;Lorenzetti L;Paolucci EO
护理专业关注社会的健康、教育和社会需求，而不是物质需求。护理专业人员是全球应对COVID-19的重要组成部分，但全球大流行及其后果显著改变了提供护理的方式。快速转向远程护理，其中基本的护理线索和机会并不容易获得，这给护理行业带来了前所未有的压力。目前缺乏明确的理解和公认的标准，教导护理专业的学生如何远程提供护理。这一系统性审查的目的是确定和评估的方式，教育工作者可以整合在线学习的机会，帮助学生制定有效的护理做法，并将这些转化为今天的远程和虚拟的护理环境。这一系统的审查将考虑不同的定量，定性和混合方法的研究创新的在线教育举措和所需的技术，护理专业教育。文章将从学术数据库中检索，仅限于报告主要数据并在过去10年内以英文发表的文章。数据提取程序将遵循系统性综述和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目。所有研究的方法学质量将使用有效的公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具和/或乔安娜布里格斯研究所定性研究的关键评估清单进行评估。将对研究特征进行制表和叙述性综合，以整合和探索数据中的关系。进行此审查不需要伦理批准。审查结果将通过同行评审的出版物，会议演示文稿传播，并用于告知和指导护理专业教育政策，实践和研究议程，以改善护理专业学生的教育，并照顾他们所服务的患者，客户和学习者。
Caring professions attend to the health, educational and social needs of society rather than its material needs. Caring professionals are a vital part of the world’s response to COVID-19, yet the global pandemic and its aftermath have significantly changed the ways in which care is provided. The rapid pivot to remote care, where the essential caring cues and opportunities are not as readily available, has put unprecedented pressure on caring professions. There is currently a lack of clear understanding and accepted standards for teaching caring profession students how to provide care remotely. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and assess the ways in which educators can integrate online learning opportunities to help students develop effective caring practices and translate these into today’s remote and virtual care environments. This systematic review will consider diverse quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies of innovative online education initiatives and required technology for caring profession education. Articles will be retrieved from academic databases and limited to articles reporting primary data and published in English within the last 10 years. Data extraction procedures will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. The methodological quality of all studies will be assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool and/or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Study characteristics will be tabulated and narratively synthesised to integrate and explore relationships within the data. No ethics approval is required to conduct this review. Review findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and be used to inform and guide caring profession education policy, practice and research agendas with the goal of improving education for caring profession students, and care for the patients, clients and learners they serve.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Bottan N;Hoffmann B;Vera-Cossio D
通讯作者：
Vera-Cossio D
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.b2535
发表时间：
2009-07-21
期刊：
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者：
PRISMA Group
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
McGrath, Mary
通讯作者：
McGrath, Mary
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Almerud, S;Alapack, R J;Ekebergh, M
通讯作者：
Ekebergh, M
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Graham, Ian D.;Kothari, Anita;McCutcheon, Chris
通讯作者：
McCutcheon, Chris