"Is this normal? Is this not normal? There's no set example": Sexual Health Intervention Preferences of LGBT Youth in Romantic Relationships.

"Is this normal? Is this not normal? There's no set example": Sexual Health Intervention Preferences of LGBT Youth in Romantic Relationships.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s13178-014-0169-2
复制
发表时间:
2015-03
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Mustanski, Brian
Mustanski, Brian
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Greene, George J.;Fisher, Kimberly A.;Kuper, Laura;Andrews, Rebecca;Mustanski, Brian

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管有证据表明存在以关系为导向的风险,包括性传播感染/艾滋病毒感染、计划外怀孕和人际暴力,但有限的研究审查了女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性青年的浪漫关系。在努力为LGBT青年提供未来的二元性健康干预措施方面,这项以夫妇为基础的研究旨在确定年轻同性伴侣最突出的性和关系问题,并评估他们对干预内容和形式的偏好。参与者是从两项正在进行的纵向研究中招募的36名年轻,种族和民族多样化的同性伴侣(N = 72人)。访谈编码使用恒定的比较方法和一个过程中的归纳和演绎的主题分析被用来解释数据。分析产生了以下干预主题:解决性风险和保护行为,改善沟通,应对家庭和关系暴力,并确定角色模型和支持来源。这些夫妇报告了对小组干预的明显偏好,许多人建议采取混合形式的干预方法(即,包括二元和在线会话)。此外,关于参与者征聘的建议包括结合互联网和社交网络推荐。
Limited research has examined the romantic relationships of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth (LGBT) despite evidence of relationship-oriented risks, including STI/HIV infection, unplanned pregnancy, and interpersonal violence. In efforts to inform future dyadic sexual health interventions for LGBT youth, this couples-based study aimed to identify the most salient sexual and relationships concerns of young same-sex couples and to assess their preferences for intervention content and format. Participants were a subset 36 young, racially and ethnically diverse, same-sex couples (N = 72 individuals) recruited from two on-going longitudinal studies. Interviews were coded using a constant comparison method and a process of inductive and deductive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data. The analysis yielded the following intervention themes: addressing sexual risk and protective behaviors, improving communication, coping with family and relationship violence, and identifying role models and sources of support. The couples reported a clear preference for small group interventions and many recommended a mixed format approach for intervention delivery (i.e., including dyadic and online sessions). Additionally, recommendations for participant recruitment included a combination of Internet-based and social network referrals.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.006
发表时间: 2012-04-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Bird, Jason D. P.;Kuhns, Lisa;Garofalo, Robert
通讯作者: Garofalo, Robert
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.031
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Antle, Becky F.;Sullivan, Dana J.;Barbee, Anita P.
通讯作者: Barbee, Anita P.
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8
发表时间: 2014-05-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Dank, Meredith;Lachman, Pamela;Yahner, Jennifer
通讯作者: Yahner, Jennifer
DOI: 10.1037/a0016140
发表时间: 2009-08-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Beeble, Marisa L.;Bybee, Deborah;Adams, Adrienne E.
通讯作者: Adams, Adrienne E.
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0210-1
发表时间: 2014-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Greene, George J.;Andrews, Rebecca;Kuper, Laura;Mustanski, Brian
通讯作者: Mustanski, Brian