Seeing Blue in Black and White: Race and Perceptions of Officer-Involved Shootings
Seeing Blue in Black and White: Race and Perceptions of Officer-Involved Shootings
复制标题
黑白中见蓝色：种族和对军官枪击事件的看法
DOI：
10.1017/s1537592720003618
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Josh Pasek
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hakeem Jefferson;F. Neuner;Josh Pasek
在种族指控事件发生后，人们对发生了什么以及如何伸张正义的看法往往存在分歧。2014年迈克尔·布朗在密苏里州弗格森被枪杀后不久收集的数据，以及对一名新警官参与枪击事件的反应，我们解开了种族分裂出现的过程。即使在信息受控的环境中，白色美国人也更喜欢支持合理枪击的信息。相反，美国黑人更喜欢暗示警官行为不当的信息。这些差异源于两个不同的过程：我们发现了一些证据，一种形式的基于种族的动机推理和强有力的证据，信念更新的基础上，种族不同的先验。当个体强烈认同自己的种族群体或对美国黑人和警察的典型行为的期望出现分歧时，简易判断的差异会更大。这些发现阐明了不同社会群体中的个人接受关于有争议事件的不同叙述的过程。
Following racially charged events, individuals often diverge in perceptions of what happened and how justice should be served. Examining data gathered shortly after the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri alongside reactions to a novel officer-involved shooting, we unpack the processes by which racial divisions emerge. Even in a controlled information environment, white Americans preferred information that supported claims of a justified shooting. Conversely, Black Americans preferred information that implied that the officer behaved inappropriately. These differences stemmed from two distinct processes: we find some evidence for a form of race-based motivated reasoning and strong evidence for belief updating based on racially distinct priors. Differences in summary judgments were larger when individuals identified strongly with their racial group or when expectations about the typical behaviors of Black Americans and police diverged. The findings elucidate processes whereby individuals in different social groups come to accept differing narratives about contentious events.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
STEELE, CM;ARONSON, J
通讯作者：
ARONSON, J