Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive
Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
复制
发表时间：
2003-11-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Jost, JT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kay, AC;Jost, JT
据推测，穷人比富人更快乐、更诚实的补充性表述会导致人们对现状的支持增加。在研究1中，与接触非互补范例的人相比，接触“贫穷但快乐”和“富有但痛苦”刻板印象范例的人在系统合理性的一般衡量标准上得分更高。研究 2 通过“贫穷但诚实”和“富有但不诚实”互补的刻板印象复制了这种效应。在研究 3 和 4 中，暴露于非互补的刻板印象范例隐式地激活了正义问题，正如在词汇决策任务中对正义相关词的反应时间比中性词更快所表明的那样。证据还表明，新教的职业道德可能会缓和刻板印象暴露对显性系统合理性（但不是隐性激活）的影响。
It was hypothesized that exposure to complementary representations of the poor as happier and more honest than the rich would lead to increased support for the status quo. In Study 1, exposure to "poor but happy" and "rich but miserable" stereotype exemplars led people to score higher on a general measure of system justification, compared with people who were exposed to noncomplementary exemplars. Study 2 replicated this effect with "poor but honest" and "rich but dishonest" complementary stereotypes. In Studies 3 and 4, exposure to noncomplementary stereotype exemplars implicitly activated justice concerns, as indicated by faster reaction times to justice-related than neutral words in a lexical decision task. Evidence also suggested that the Protestant work ethic may moderate the effects of stereotype exposure on explicit system justification (but not implicit activation).