Social functioning and emotional regulation in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes
Social functioning and emotional regulation in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15374424jccp2901_4
复制
发表时间：
2000-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Carlson, CL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maedgen, JW;Carlson, CL
比较16名注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）合并型（ADHD-C）、14名ADHD主要为注意力不集中型（ADHD-I）和17名对照儿童的父母和教师对社会地位和表现的评定、社会知识和表现的自我报告以及情绪调节任务的行为观察。分析显示，ADHD亚组之间的社会功能障碍的不同模式。患有ADHD-C的儿童被认为表现出更多的攻击性行为;此外，他们表现出情绪失调，其特征是高强度和高水平的洗澡积极和消极行为。相比之下，ADHD-I儿童被认为表现出社会被动性，并在自我报告措施中表现出社会知识的缺陷，但没有证据表明情绪调节存在问题。回归分析显示，社会表现，情绪调节，并在较小程度上，社会知识，预测的社会地位。这些研究结果的应用，以了解ADHD亚型的社会赤字的性质和未来的研究方向进行了讨论。
Compared 16 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined type (ADHD-C), 14 children with ADHD predominantly inattentive type (ADHD-I), and 17 controls on parent and teacher ratings of social status and performance, self-report of social knowledge and performance, and observations of behavior on an emotional regulation task. Analyses revealed distinct patterns of social dysfunction between ADHD subgroups. Children with ADHD-C were rated as showing more aggressive behavior;furthermore, they displayed emotional dysregulation characterized by high intensity and high levels of bath positive and negative behavior. In contrast, children with ADHD-I were perceived as displaying social passivity and showed deficits in social knowledge on the self-report measure but did not evidence problems in emotional regulation. Regression analyses revealed that social performance, emotional regulation, and to a lesser degree, social knowledge, were predictive of social status. The application of these findings to understanding the nature of the social deficits in the ADHD subtypes and directions for future research are discussed.