Matching the choice of injury/illness definition to study setting, purpose and design: one size does not fit all!
Matching the choice of injury/illness definition to study setting, purpose and design: one size does not fit all!
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bjsports-2013-093297
复制
发表时间：
2014-04-01
影响因子：
18.4
通讯作者：
Bahr, Roald
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clarsen, Benjamin;Bahr, Roald
什么构成了“可记录事件”可以说是影响运动损伤和疾病监测研究结果的最关键的方法学因素。尽管许多共识声明试图简化监测方法，但目前对伤害的定义仍存在相当大的差异。选择定义的基础是一些实际和理论问题，包括监测的持续时间和设置、可用资源、感兴趣的伤害和疾病的类型、如何收集数据以及数据的用途。研究之间的结果具有可比性也是非常可取的;无论是在体育运动内部还是在体育运动之间。然而，最重要的是，监测数据必须是valid.As没有一个单一的定义是可能适合所有的需求，本文的目的是审查的优势和局限性的三个最常用的定义在运动流行病学，并检查其适当性取决于上下文和目标的监测。我们特别关注数据收集方法，因为这可能对数据的可靠性产生重要影响。
What constitutes a ‘recordable event’is arguably the most critical methodological factor affecting the results of sports injury and illness surveillance studies. Although numerous consensus statements have attempted to standardise surveillance methodology, 1–6 there remains considerable variation in current definitions of injury. Underlying the choice of definition are a number of practical and theoretical issues, including the duration and setting of surveillance, the available resources, the type of injuries and illnesses of interest, how data are to be collected and what they are to be used for. It is also highly desirable that results are comparable between studies; both within and between sports. Above all, however, surveillance data must be valid.As no single definition is likely to suit all needs, the purpose of this article is to review the strengths and limitations of the three most commonly used definitions in sports epidemiology and to examine their appropriateness depending on the context and objectives of surveillance. We focus particularly on methods of data collection, as this may have important consequences on the reliability of data.