Vertical Trapping of the Coffee Berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), in Coffee.
Vertical Trapping of the Coffee Berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), in Coffee.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/insects12070607
复制
发表时间：
2021-07-02
期刊：
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Rodrigues JCV
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ruiz-Diaz CP;Rodrigues JCV
在全球范围内，咖啡浆果小食心虫Hypothenemus hamei(Ferrari)(鞘翅目：卷蛾科：Scolytinae)严重影响咖啡的品质和产量。为了了解如何控制这种害虫，我们研究了它们在不同诱捕高度随时间的捕获模式。无论温度变化、降雨量和相对湿度如何，诱饵柱诱捕器在0.5米高度捕获的咖啡浆果害虫比在较高高度捕获的更多。了解最有效捕捉昆虫的高度位置对于制定未来控制咖啡害虫的经济有效的管理策略是有用的。咖啡浆果害虫每年给全球咖啡业造成数百万美元的损失；这些损失意味着质量和产量的下降。诱捕器被用来监视它们的飞行和控制虫害。本研究的主要目的是在两个独立的田间试验中，利用柱状诱捕器(CT)来确定CBB种群随时间的捕获模式和诱捕百分比。CTS由四个陷阱组成，安装在离地面0.5、1.5、2.5和3.5米的四个不同高度。我们的结果表明，放置在地面不同高度的诱捕器捕获CBB的效果有显著差异。CT捕捉在整个研究滞后过程中保持一种模式：高度越低，捕捉到的CBB的百分比越大。这项研究在两个独立的实验(A和B)中进行。在实验A和B中，放置在0.5m处的陷阱分别捕获了67%和85%的CBB。此外，在多层螺旋CT中，放置在距地面1.5m处的诱捕器的捕获率高于单放置诱捕器(ST，也是在距地面1.5m处)。尽管季节、温度和空气相对湿度发生了变化，但在整个研究过程中，CBB的捕获模式和CBB在CTS中的比例保持不变。我们建议，考虑到CBB的监测和管理，可以将CTS作为捕获CBB的有用工具进行探索。
Globally, the Coffee Berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), severely affects the quality and production of coffee. To understand how to control this pest, we studied their capture patterns at different trapping heights over time. Baited column traps captured more coffee berry borers at 0.5m height than at higher heights irrespective of temperature changes, rainfall, and relative humidity. Understanding the height position for the most efficient insect capture is useful for developing future cost-effective management strategies to control this coffee pest. The coffee industry loses millions of dollars annually worldwide due to the Coffee Berry Borer (CBB); these losses imply a decrease in quality and production. Traps are used to monitor their flight and for pest control. The main objective of this study was to determine the capture pattern and trap capture percentages of the CBB population over time using column traps (CTs) in two independent field experiments. CTs were composed of four traps installed at four different heights 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 m above ground. Our results demonstrated a significant difference in CBB capture by traps placed at different heights above the ground. The CT capture maintained a pattern throughout this study’s lag: the lower the height, the greater the percentage of CBBs captured. The study was conducted in two independent experiments (A and B). In Experiment A and B, the traps placed at 0.5 m caught 67% and 85% of the CBBs captured, respectively. Furthermore, the trap set at 1.5 m above the ground in the multi-level CT showed a higher capture percentage than the single placed trap (ST, also at 1.5 m about ground). The pattern of the capture and proportion of the CBB in the CTs was maintained throughout the study despite the season, changes in temperature, and relative air humidity. We suggest that CTs could be explored as a useful tool for capturing the CBB, considering its monitoring and management.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.3791/57204
发表时间：
2018-03-19
期刊：
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Johnson MA;Hollingsworth R;Fortna S;Aristizábal LF;Manoukis NC
通讯作者：
Manoukis NC
影响因子：
3
作者：
Messing RH
通讯作者：
Messing RH
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Pereira, Adriano E.;Vilela, Evaldo F.;Franca, Christiane F. M.
通讯作者：
Franca, Christiane F. M.
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Warton, David I.;Hui, Francis K. C.
通讯作者：
Hui, Francis K. C.
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Maria Castro, Ana;Tapias, Johanna;Gongora, Carmenza E.
通讯作者：
Gongora, Carmenza E.