Institutional entrepreneurship in transforming energy systems towards sustainability: Wind energy in Finland and India

Institutional entrepreneurship in transforming energy systems towards sustainability: Wind energy in Finland and India
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.002
复制
发表时间:
2016-07
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
S. Jolly;P. Spodniak;R. Raven
S. Jolly;P. Spodniak;R. Raven
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Jolly;P. Spodniak;R. Raven

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

越来越多的文献研究了不同成熟和新兴制度背景下风能发展的动态。然而,到目前为止,只有少数人停下来反思发达经济体和新兴经济体之间的差异。建立在文献上的制度创业,本文比较了在芬兰和印度的风能开发的制度战略,使用的类型学的政治,技术和文化工作。我们强调制度方法在研究成熟和新兴制度背景下的可持续能源转型中的作用,同时对异质行为体在塑造制度安排中的作用保持敏感。我们的研究结果提供了在制度创业文学的辩论的影响,探讨如何在不同的情况下,演员塑造他们的制度环境,以及在何种程度上新兴的制度环境提供更多的机会,制度创业。最后,本文强调,需要发展的见解,成功的集体机构创业的有利条件,并制定类型的体制战略,这是概括在成熟和新兴的体制环境。
A growing body of literature has examined the dynamics of wind energy development across different mature and emerging institutional contexts. However, so far only few have paused to reflect on the differences between developed and emerging economies. Building upon the literature on institutional entrepreneurship, this paper compares institutional strategies in wind energy development in Finland and India by using the typology of political, technical and cultural work. We highlight the role of institutional approaches in studying sustainable energy transitions in mature and emerging institutional contexts, while being sensitive to the role of heterogeneous actors in shaping institutional arrangements. Our findings offer implications for debates in the institutional entrepreneurship literature by exploring how actors shape their institutional environment in different contexts, and the extent to which emerging institutional contexts provide more opportunities for institutional entrepreneurship. Finally, this paper underscores the need for developing insights into enabling conditions for successful collective institutional entrepreneurship and for developing typologies of institutional strategies which are generalizable across both mature and emerging institutional contexts.