Strangers at the Benchside: Research ethics consultation

Strangers at the Benchside: Research ethics consultation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/15265160802109322
复制
发表时间:
2008-01-01
影响因子:
13.4
通讯作者:
Magnus, David
Magnus, David
中科院分区:
人文科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cho, Mildred K.;Tobin, Sara L.;Magnus, David

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

为生物医学科学家提供的机构伦理咨询服务已经开始激增,特别是对临床研究人员。我们讨论了几种模式的伦理咨询,并描述了一个团队为基础的方法在斯坦福大学在这些模式的背景下使用。随着研究伦理咨询服务的扩大,有许多尚未解决的问题需要解决,包括这些服务的范围,组成和目的应该是什么,顾问的核心能力是否可以和应该被定义,以及如何缓解利益冲突。我们提出了初步建议的结构和过程中的研究伦理咨询,根据我们的初步经验,在一个试点项目。
Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should be mitigated. We make preliminary recommendations for the structure and process of research ethics consultation, based on our initial experiences in a pilot program.