Comparison of two structured interviews on a psychiatrically hospitalized population of children.
Comparison of two structured interviews on a psychiatrically hospitalized population of children.
复制标题
对精神病院儿童群体进行两次结构化访谈的比较。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
影响因子：
13.3
通讯作者：
A. Daniel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Carlson;J. Kashani;M. Thomas;Alzira F. Vaidya;A. Daniel
对30名8 - 12岁的儿童及其父母进行了两次结构化访谈，即儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表（K-SADS-P）和儿童和青少年诊断性访谈（DICA）。DSM-III轴I访谈诊断与最佳估计诊断进行了比较，从图表审查和所有可用的信息后，孩子出院。Kappa评分适中，因为最初的结构化访谈倾向于做出随后未被验证的诊断。其原因包括：（1）事实上，访谈是在压力水平最高的时候进行的，这导致了症状的过度报告，与可用于最佳估计诊断的纵向观察相反：（2）在住院儿童中研究的这些障碍（行为障碍，注意力缺陷障碍和对立障碍）之间的现象学区别是模糊的。
Two structured interviews, the present episode version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for children (K-SADS-P) and the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA), were administered to 30 8− to 12-year-old children and their parents on admission to an inpatient psychiatric facility. DSM-III axis I interview diagnoses were compared with best estimate diagnoses made from chart review and all available information after the child was discharged. Kappa scores were modest because the initial structured interview tended to make diagnoses that were not subsequently verified. Reasons for this include: (1) the fact that interviews were done at a time when stress levels were highest, leading to symptom overreporting, in contrast to the longitudinal observations available for best estimate diagnoses: and (2) the phenomenological distinctions between such disorders studied in children in inpatient settings (conduct disorder, attention deficit disorder and oppositional disorder are blurred.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chambers,WJ;Puig-Antich,J;Hirsch,M;Paez,P;Ambrosini,PJ;Tabrizi,MA;Davies,M
通讯作者：
Davies,M
终生精神病诊断的最佳估计：方法学研究。
影响因子：
--
作者：
Leckman,JF;Sholomskas,D;Thompson,WD;Belanger,A;Weissman,MM
通讯作者：
Weissman,MM