Source of head injury for pedestrians and pedal cyclists: Striking vehicle or road?
Source of head injury for pedestrians and pedal cyclists: Striking vehicle or road?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.024
复制
发表时间：
2013-01-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Lenard, James
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Badea-Romero, Alexandro;Lenard, James
基于车辆的二级安全系统保护行人和骑自行车者的潜在有效性与因接触道路或地面而不是与撞击车辆接触而造成伤害的情况的比例有关。对英国现场研究中涉及头部受伤或受到撞击的弱势道路使用者的205起事故进行了详细的案例审查，结果表明，在110起案件中，与道路接触是造成事故的原因。然而，车辆与大多数更严重的伤亡有关：AIS 2+头部损伤水平为31（车辆）与26（道路），AIS 3+水平为20（车辆）与13（道路）。使用多变量分类模型的进一步分析确定了与伤害源相关的几个因素，即撞击车辆和弱势道路使用者之间的相互作用类型，弱势道路使用者的年龄和伤害的性质。(C)2012爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
The potential effectiveness of vehicle-based secondary safety systems for the protection of pedestrians and pedal cyclists is related to the proportion of cases where injury arises by contact with the road or ground rather than with the striking vehicle. A detailed case review of 205 accidents from the UK On-the-Spot study involving vulnerable road users with head injuries or impacts indicated that contact with the road was responsible in 110 cases. The vehicle however was associated with a majority of more serious casualties: 31 (vehicle) compared with 26 (road) at AIS 2+ head injury level and 20 (vehicle) compared with 13 (road) at AIS 3+ level. Further analysis using a multivariate classification model identified several factors that correlated with the source of injury, namely the type of interaction between the striking vehicle and vulnerable road user, the age of the vulnerable road user and the nature of injury. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.