Comparison of the 13C-urea blood test to histology and rapid urease testing in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children.
Comparison of the 13C-urea blood test to histology and rapid urease testing in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children.
复制标题
13C-尿素血液检测与组织学和快速尿素酶检测在儿童幽门螺杆菌感染诊断中的比较。
DOI:
10.1097/01.mpg.0000243426.78721.bc
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Wagner,DavidA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jolley,ChristopherD;Wagner,DavidA
Objective:Helicobacter pylori infection is commonly investigated in children with abdominal pain. The definitive means of diagnosing infection, histology, requires endoscopy and sedation, making it invasive and expensive. Our objective was to compare histology against a less invasive and safer method, the 13 C-urea blood test.Patients and Methods:Forty children with abdominal pain undergoing upper endoscopy were randomized into either of 2 dosages of 13 C-urea. Several biopsies were taken for histology and rapid urease testing. After endoscopy, each child ingested a randomly assigned dosage of either 75 mg or 125 mg 13 C-urea, and blood was withdrawn 30 min later.Results:Irrespective of the dosage of 13 C-urea, the 13 C-urea blood test performed with high accuracy (89%) when compared against either histology or rapid urease testing. The sensitivity and specificity of the blood test was 83% and 91%, respectively. When the smaller dosage of 13 C-urea was used, the accuracy of the blood test was 100% compared with histology. There were no adverse events related to using either dosage of 13 C-urea.Conclusions:The 13 C-urea blood test may be comparable with histology in diagnosing H pylori infection in children, and the smaller dosage of 13 C-urea does not adversely affect blood test performance. The 13 C-urea blood test is well tolerated in children.