Contagion! Systemic Risk in Financial Networks
Contagion! Systemic Risk in Financial Networks
复制标题
传染!
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Hurd
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Hurd
Attempts to define systemic risk are summarized and found to be deficient in various respects. In this introductory chapter, after considering some of the salient features of financial crises in the past, we focus on the key characteristics of banks, their balance sheets and how they are regulated. Bankruptcy! Mr. Micawber, David Copperfield’s debt-ridden sometime mentor, knew first hand the difference between surplus and deficit, between happiness and the debtors’ prison. In Dickens’ fictional universe, and perhaps even in the real world of Victorian England, a small businessman’s unpaid debts were never overlooked but always lead him and his loved ones to the unmitigated misery of the poorhouse. On the other hand, the aristocrats and upper classes, were treated more delicately, and usually given a comfortable escape. For people, firms, and in particular banks, bankruptcy in modern times is more complicated yet it still retains some of the flavour of the olden days. When a bank fails, it often seems that the rich financiers responsible for its collapse and the collateral damage it inflicts walk away from the wreckage with intact bonuses and compensation packages. When a particularly egregious case arises and a scapegoat is needed, then a middle rank banker is identified who takes the bullet for the disaster. A cynic might say that despite the dictates of Basel I, II, III, ...•, bank executives remain free to take excessive risks with their company, receiving a rich fraction of any upside while insulating themselves from any possible disaster they might cause. As we learn afresh during every large scale financial crisis, society at large pays the ultimate costs when banks fail. Spiking unemployment leads to the poverty of 1 Charles Dickens, David Copperfield, Chapter 12, p. 185 (1950). First published 1849–1850.