Understanding interaction design practices

Understanding interaction design practices
复制标题

了解交互设计实践

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ron Wakkary
Ron Wakkary
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Goodman;Erik Stolterman;Ron Wakkary

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在旨在影响交互设计实践的人机交互研究与相关从业者之间存在着不可取的差距。为了缩小这一差距,我们提倡从理论和方法上关注设计师的日常生活经验。迄今为止,这类理论生成型、以经验为导向的研究关注的是技术的使用者,而不是设计者。相反,我们建议HCI研究人员将注意力转向产生与实践者本身产生共鸣的交互设计实践理论。在本文的第一部分中,我们描述了人机交互研究与交互设计实践之间的不匹配。然后,我们从商业设计实践的观察研究中呈现小插曲来说明手头的问题。在第二部分中,我们讨论了研究实践中的方法和理论变化,这些变化可能支持将人机交互研究与交互设计实践相结合的目标。然后,我们讨论当前的研究方法和理论,以确定可能扩大我们对实践的看法的变化。第三部分阐述了我们的理论思想议程和一种理想型理论。
There is an undesirable gap between HCI research aimed at influencing interaction design practice and the practitioners in question. To close this gap, we advocate a theoretical and methodological focus on the day-to-day, lived experience of designers. To date, this type of theory-generative, experientially oriented research has focused on the users of technologies, not the designers. In contrast, we propose that HCI researchers turn their attention to producing theories of interaction design practice that resonate with practitioners themselves. In part one of this paper, we describe the mismatch between HCI research and interaction design practices. Then we present vignettes from an observational study of commercial design practice to illustrate the issues at hand. In part two, we discuss methodological and theoretical changes in research practice that might support the goal of integrating HCI research with interaction design practices. We then discuss current research methods and theories to identify changes that might enlarge our view on practice. In part three, we elaborate on our theoretically minded agenda and a kind of ideal-type theory.