Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.
Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41746-023-00986-6
复制
发表时间:
2024-01-23
影响因子:
15.2
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Algorithms that assist with the early recognition of sepsis may improve outcomes, but relatively few studies have examined their impact on real-world patient outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact of a deep-learning model (COMPOSER) for the early prediction of sepsis on patient outcomes. We completed a before-and-after quasi-experimental study at two distinct Emergency Departments (EDs) within the UC San Diego Health System. We included 6217 adult septic patients from 1/1/2021 through 4/30/2023. The exposure tested was a nurse-facing Best Practice Advisory (BPA) triggered by COMPOSER. In-hospital mortality, sepsis bundle compliance, 72-h change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score following sepsis onset, ICU-free days, and the number of ICU encounters were evaluated in the pre-intervention period (705 days) and the post-intervention period (145 days). The causal impact analysis was performed using a Bayesian structural time-series approach with confounder adjustments to assess the significance of the exposure at the 95% confidence level. The deployment of COMPOSER was significantly associated with a 1.9% absolute reduction (17% relative decrease) in in-hospital sepsis mortality (95% CI, 0.3%–3.5%), a 5.0% absolute increase (10% relative increase) in sepsis bundle compliance (95% CI, 2.4%–8.0%), and a 4% (95% CI, 1.1%–7.1%) reduction in 72-h SOFA change after sepsis onset in causal inference analysis. This study suggests that the deployment of COMPOSER for early prediction of sepsis was associated with a significant reduction in mortality and a significant increase in sepsis bundle compliance.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1002/emp2.12297
发表时间:
2020-12
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Carlile M;Hurt B;Hsiao A;Hogarth M;Longhurst CA;Dameff C
通讯作者:
Dameff C
影响因子:
17.1
作者:
Henry, Katharine E.;Hager, David N.;Saria, Suchi
通讯作者:
Saria, Suchi
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Kumar, Arland;Roberts, Daniel;Cheang, Mary
通讯作者:
Cheang, Mary
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
通讯作者:
--
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201609-1848oc
发表时间:
2017-10-01
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Liu, Vincent X.;Fielding-Singh, Vikram;Escobar, Gabriel J.
通讯作者:
Escobar, Gabriel J.