Punishment in human choice: Direct or competitive suppression?
Punishment in human choice: Direct or competitive suppression?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1901/jeab.2003.80-1
复制
发表时间:
2003-07-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Newland, MC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Critchfield, TS;Paletz, EM;Newland, MC
This investigation compared the predictions of two models describing the integration of reinforcement and punishment effects ill operant choice. Deluty's (1976) competitive-suppression model (conceptually related to two-factor punishment theories) and de Villiers (1980) direct-suppression model (conceptually related to one-factor punishment theories) have been tested previously ill non-humans but not at die individual level ill humans. Mouse clicking by College students Was Maintained in a two-alternative concurrent schedule of variable-interval money reinforcement. Punishment Consisted of variable-interval money losses. Experiment I verified that money loss was an effective punisher in this context. Experiment 2 consisted of qualitative model comparisons similar to those used in previous studies involving nonhumans. Following a no-punishment baseline, punishment, was superimposed Upon both response alternatives. Under schedule ,allies for which the direct-suppression model, but not the competitive-suppression model, predicted distinct shifts from baseline performance, or vice versa, 12 of 14 individual-subject functions, generated by 7 subjects, supported the direct-suppression model. When the punishment models were converted to the form of the generalized matching law, least-squares linear regression fits for a direct-suppression model were superior to those of a competitive-suppression model for 6 of 7 subjects. In Experiment 3, a more thorough quantitative test of the modified models, tits for a direct suppression model were superior in I I of 13 cases. These results correspond well to those of investigations conducted With nonhumans and provide the first individual-subject evidence that a direct suppression model, evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively, de scribes human punishment better than a competitive-suppression model. We discuss implications for developing better punishment models and future investigations of punishment, in human choice.