ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA IN THE ELDERLY - BIOLOGY AND TREATMENT
ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA IN THE ELDERLY - BIOLOGY AND TREATMENT
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2141.1993.tb04622.x
复制
发表时间:
1993-01-01
影响因子:
6.5
通讯作者:
YIN, AL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
JOHNSON, PRE;YIN, AL
With improved supportive care and very intensive chemotherapy, with or without bone marrow transplantation, it is now possible to cure an increasing number of younger patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, approximately 60% of patients with AML are over 60 years old (Brinker, 1982). and the management of such elderly patients has been generally unsatisfactory. Thus it is timely to review the specific problems which elderly patients with AML pose. and discuss the various treatment modalities currently available.Epidemiology The annual incidence of AML in the United Kingdom rises exponentially with increasing age from less than 1 per IOOOOOl in patients under 30, to over 10 per 100000 in patients over 70 (Cartwright et al, 1990). Furthermore, while in 1991 the population of the United Kingdom was 57.6 million, with approximately 11.9 million (20.7%) over the age of 60. in 2031 the projected total population will be 61.3 million (an increase of 6.4%), with 16.5 million (an increase of 38.2%) over the age of 60 (OPCS, 1991). If leukaemia incidence remains static over this period, extrapolation of UK Leukaemia Research Fund epidemiology data (Cart-Wright et al. 1990) to these demographic changes projects a 20.5% increase in cases of AML by 2031. This figure comprises a reduction of 1.7% in cases under 60 years old, but an increase of 37.8% in cases aged 60-74, and 39% in cases over 75 years old. These changes will have major medical and financial implications for the management of elderly patients with AML over the next 40 years. Whilst the median age of all patients with AML is 64 years (Brinker, 1982). the median age in recent treatment trials is approximately 50 years with a range from 44 to 53 years (Champkn et al. 1987; Rees & Gray, 1990). Such preselection, tending to exclude older patients (Fig l), clearly results in the reporting of over-optimistic remission rates (Toronto Leukaemia Study Group, 1986).