An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective
An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1475-682x.1997.tb00445.x
复制
发表时间：
1997-09-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Benford, RD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Benford, RD
在过去的十年里，框架视角在社会运动研究者和理论家中越来越受欢迎。令人惊讶的是，没有对这一不断增长的文献进行批判性评估。虽然这一视角对运动文学做出了重要贡献。但它有几个缺点。这些包括忽视系统的实证研究，描述性偏见，静态倾向，物化，还原论，精英偏见和单一倾向。除了对现存的运动框架文学的批评之外，我还提供了几种补救措施，并用最近的工作来说明它们。作者：Francesca Polletta，John H.埃文斯、莎伦·埃里克森·内普斯塔德和伊拉银在这一特别章节中讨论了这一批评中提出的几个问题，并在这样做的过程中，对社会运动的结构和文化方法的整合做出了贡献。
In the last decade the framing perspective has gained increasing popularity among social movement researchers and theorists. Surprisingly, there has been no critical assessment of this growing body of literature. Though the perspective has made significant contributions to the movements literature. it suffers from several shortcomings. These include neglect of systematic empirical studies, descriptive bias, static tendencies, reification, reductionism, elite bias, and monolithic tendencies. In addition to a critique of extant movement framing literature, I offer several remedies and illustrate them with recent work. The articles by Francesca Polletta, John H. Evans, Sharon Erickson Nepstad, and Ira Silver in this special section address several of the concerns raised in this critique and, in so doing, contribute to the integration of structural and cultural approaches to social movements.