Comparison of creatinine and cystatin formulae with 51Chromium-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid glomerular filtration rate in patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Comparison of creatinine and cystatin formulae with 51Chromium-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid glomerular filtration rate in patients with decompensated cirrhosis
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/jgh.13446
复制
发表时间:
2017-01-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Akriviadis, Evangelos
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cholongitas, Evangelos;Ioannidou, Maria;Akriviadis, Evangelos
Background and AimEvaluation of renal function, that is, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), has become very important, but conventional mathematical formulae for GFR assessment are inaccurate in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to compare serum creatinine (sCr)-based and serum cystatin C (cysC)-based estimated GFR (eGFR) formulae with (51)Chromium-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid GFR ((51)Chr-GFR) in patients with stable decompensated cirrhosis.MethodsIn 129 Caucasian patients with decompensated cirrhosis, we assessed sCr-based GFRs [Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and chronic kidney disease-epidemiology (CKD-EPI)-sCr formulae], cysC-based GFRs [Hoek, Larsson, and CKD-EPI-cysC equations], and the mathematical formulae, which combined both sCr and cysC [i.e. CKD-EPI-sCr-cysC and the specific for cirrhotics formula recently proposed by Mindikoglu et al. (Mindikoglu-eGFR)]. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used for GFR predictors in our cohort.ResultsThe correlations between (51)Chr-GFR and all mathematical formulae were good (Spearman r(2)>0.68, P