The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
复制标题
奇异效应：这并不奇怪，而是很复杂。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.422
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brady,P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McDaniel,MA;Einstein,GO;DeLosh,EL;May,CP;Brady,P
当奇异性作为受试者内（混合列表）变量变化时，相对于普通图像（奇异性效应），人们对奇异图像的回忆会更高。在实验1中，混合列表，而不是通常在此类列表中使用的较少数量的奇异句子，决定了奇异效应的发生。与预期违背理论的预测相反，实验 2 和 3 表明，旨在增强或减弱对奇异句子的惊讶反应的操作对奇异效应几乎没有影响。实验 4 和 5 表明，混合会影响参与者对奇异物品和常见物品的订单信息进行差异编码的程度。提出了一种关于奇异效应的新解释，它将独特性考虑与奇异项和常见项之间顺序信息的差异使用相结合。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
Higher recall of bizarre images relative to common images (the bizarreness effect) is consistently found when bizarreness is varied as a within-subject (mixed-list) variable. In Experiment 1, mixed lists, rather than the smaller number of bizarre sentences typically used in such lists, determined the occurrence of the bizarreness effect. Contrary to predictions from expectation-violation theory, Experiments 2 and 3 showed that manipulations designed to augment or attenuate surprise reactions to bizarre sentences had little impact on the bizarreness effect. Experiments 4 and 5 indicated that mixing affected the degree to which participants differentially encoded order information for bizarre and common items. A new account of the bizarreness effect is presented that combines considerations of distinctiveness with the differential use of order information across bizarre and common items.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)