Human sexual inadequacy.

Human sexual inadequacy.
复制标题

人类性功能不足。

DOI:
10.1001/jama.1970.03170380058026
复制
发表时间:
1970
期刊:
The Medical journal of Australia
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
N. Shainess
N. Shainess
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Shainess

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

如果写得简明扼要,不重复,这本书将占据大约三分之一的空间,相当清晰,相应地,不那么令人印象深刻。其令人印象深刻的部分原因是它的风格:在任何地方都不是人称代词;只有基金会。这本书的语言比它早期的同伴《人类性反应》要简单一些,但实际上仍然无法阅读。样品名称:“在非高潮回归状态下进入治疗的女性反映了她们的生物物理和心理社会影响系统的任何有效调整的完全失败。“什么意思?错综复杂的措辞、矛盾和具体化都有一个熟悉的音符。就像麦迪逊大道的广告人给我们的“腹部隆起”和“告密者灰色”一样,马斯特斯博士提供了一个分类,其中有代表性的是“感官焦点”,“终点释放”和“性交机会”-加入了早期的创造,如“高潮平台”。“这本书包含一个56页的参考书目,但文本并没有显示所列材料已在书中使用,在通常情况下,
If written concisely and unrepetitively, this book would occupy about one-third the space, be considerably clearer, and correspondingly less impressive. Part of its impressiveness is its style: not a personal pronoun anywhere; only the Foundation. The language is somewhat simpler than its earlier companion piece, Human Sexual Response , but it is still virtually unreadable. Sample: "Women entering therapy in a state of non-orgasmic return reflected complete failure of any effective alignment of their biophysical and psychosocial systems of influence." Meaning? The convoluted phraseology, contradictions, and reifications strike a familiar note. Like the Madison Avenue ad men who gave us "midriff bulge" and "tattletale grey," Dr. Masters offers an assortment, representative of which are "sensate focus," "endpoint release," and "coital opportunity"—joining earlier creations like "orgasmic platform." The book contains a 56-page bibliography, but the text does not show that the listed material has been utilized within the book, in the usual