An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains
An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.technovation.2009.10.002
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
12.5
通讯作者：
Miyazaki, Kumiko
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Islam, Nazrul;Miyazaki, Kumiko
自过去十年以来，世界范围内加强了纳米技术的研究活动，以通过把握纳米科学和技术机遇为技术进步提供基础。本文旨在对纳米技术的研究领域进行重新分类，以了解纳米技术的整个研究光谱。我们还使用技术挖掘(Porter 2005)方法对研究领域进行了横向比较。研究结果显示了纳米技术研究领域的地区优势和劣势，表明美国在生物技术研究方面相对于其他领域和其他地区(如欧盟、日本、中国)来说已经获得了很大的优势。韩国和印度)在纳米材料、纳米电子学、纳米制造和工具方面拥有强大的研究实力。本文通过对纳米技术研究进行分类，为纳米技术管理的文献做出贡献，并为纳米科学和技术领域的学术和行业从业者提供有用的见解(C)2009爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Research activities in nanotechnology have been strengthened worldwide since the last decade to provide a foundation for technological advancement by grasping nanoscience and technology opportunities This paper aims to make a refilled classification to understand the whole research spectrum in nanotechnologies We also provide an insight into horizontal comparisons between the research domains using tech mining (Porter 2005) method The findings show the regional strengths and weaknesses in nanotechnology research domains, indicating that the US has gained much strength in bionanotechnology research relative to other domains, and the other regions (e.g. the EU, Japan, China. South Korea and India) have gained their research strength in nanomaterials, nanoelectronics and nanomanufacturing and tools The paper contributes to the literature of nanotechnology management by providing a categorization of nanotechnology research and offers a useful insight for academic and industry practitioners in nanoscience and technology fields (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.