A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection
A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02137.x
复制
发表时间：
1997-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Iacono, WG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allen, JJB;Iacono, WG
我们以前报道过，一个基于贝叶斯的事件相关的潜在记忆评估程序（Alien，Iacono，& Danielson，1992，Psychophysiology，29，504-522）在识别以前学习过的材料方面非常准确，而不管个人隐藏信息的动机动机如何。当一个自举程序（法威尔和唐钦，1991年，心理生理学，28，531-547）被应用于这些相同的数据，更大的动机激励似乎增加了程序的准确性。受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线被用来检查这两个程序和一个新的程序。ROC曲线表明，所有这三种方法产生极高的分类准确率和自举程序的激励的敏感性是由于特定的切割点选择。一种或另一种方法可能是首选，这取决于欺骗的动机，错误决策的成本，以及额外的心理生理数据的可用性。
We previously reported that a Bayesian-based event-related potential memory assessment procedure (Alien, Iacono, & Danielson, 1992, Psychophysiology, 29, 504-522) was highly accurate at identifying previously learned material, regardless of an individual's motivational incentive to conceal information. When a bootstrapping procedure (Farwell & Donchin, 1991, Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547) is applied to these same data, greater motivational incentives appear to increase the accuracy of the procedure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine these two procedures and a new procedure. ROC curves indicated that all three methods produce extremely high rates of classification accuracy and that the sensitivity of the bootstrapping procedure to motivational incentive is due to the particular cut points selected. One or the other method may be preferred depending upon incentive to deceive, the cost of incorrect decisions, and the availability of extra psychophysiological data.