Learning to Share: Mandates and Open Access
Learning to Share: Mandates and Open Access
复制标题
学习分享：授权和开放获取
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Kennan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Kennan
目的-研究出版物的在线开放获取（OA）作为一种有意义的愿景，与科学和学术的目标相一致。有人认为，经常由公共资金资助的研究应该是一项公益事业。鉴于其有远见的特点和它的一致性与奖学金的目的，本文的目的是探讨为什么开放存取是不是所有的研究人员，所有的时间，或更多的鼓励图书馆manager.Design/方法/approach -在文件中报告的调查结果是建立在分析的文献，目前的讨论发生在电子列表和其他公共论坛，并在定性研究使用观察，文件分析，访谈技术和主题分析进行的博士研究的一部分，在两所澳大利亚universities.Findings -其中一所大学有一个长期的体制任务，鼓励OA和其他没有。就调查结果而言，在所研究的大学中，有...
Purpose – Online open access (OA) to research publications comes to scholarship as a vision that makes sense and is congruent with the aims of science and scholarship. It is argued that research, often funded out of the public purse, should be a public good. Given its visionary characteristics and its congruence with the aims of scholarship, the purpose of this paper is to examine why OA is not practiced by all researchers, all the time, or more encouraged by library managers.Design/methodology/approach – The findings reported in the paper are built upon analyses of the literature, the current discussion occurring in e‐lists and other public forums, and upon qualitative research using observation, document analysis, interview techniques and thematic analysis conducted as part of a PhD study in two Australian universities.Findings – One of the universities had a long‐standing institutional mandate to encourage OA and the other did not. In terms of findings, of the universities studied, the institution with...