Changes in Victimization Risk and Disparities for Heterosexual and Sexual Minority Youth: Trends From 2009 to 2017.
Changes in Victimization Risk and Disparities for Heterosexual and Sexual Minority Youth: Trends From 2009 to 2017.
复制标题
异性恋和性少数青少年受害风险和差异的变化：2009 年至 2017 年的趋势。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.009
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Phillips2nd,Gregory
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Poteat,VPaul;Birkett,Michelle;Turner,Blair;Wang,Xinzi;Phillips2nd,Gregory
本研究的目的是确定异性恋、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和质疑青年受害风险的性别分层趋势，同时考虑2009年至2017年性取向差异的变化。方法青年风险行为调查（YRBS）数据每两年收集一次（五波; 2009-2017）汇集了56个司法管辖区和454，715名学生，是迄今为止最具全国代表性的异性恋和性少数青年样本之一。我们使用疾病控制和预防中心推荐的趋势分析方法分析了七项受害风险评估。我们使用逻辑回归与年身份的相互作用，以测试是否性取向为基础的差距扩大，缩小，或保持随着时间的推移.ResultsVictimization风险显着下降，男性和女性双性恋和质疑青年，女同性恋，男同性恋和异性恋青年。双性恋，质疑，女同性恋女性和异性恋女性之间的差距缩小，双性恋和异性恋男性之间。然而，基于性取向的差异仍然显着的所有性少数青年在2017.ConclusionsDistinct模式的变化，受害风险的特定群体的性少数青年强调，需要考虑的变化性少数青年社区;将他们作为一个单一的群体可能会掩盖细微的差异。受害风险的一些相对较小的下降也表明，需要采取干预措施，以解决一套更全面的受害相关风险，而不仅仅是欺凌和所需的努力，不限于直接的学校环境。
PurposeThe aim of this study was to identify sex-stratified trends in victimization risk specific to heterosexual, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning youth while considering changes in sexual orientation-disparities from 2009 to 2017.MethodsYouth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data collected biennially (five waves; 2009–2017) were pooled across 56 jurisdictions and 454,715 students for one of the most nationally representative samples of heterosexual and sexual minority youth to date. We analyzed a seven-item victimization risk assessment using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended trend analysis approach. We used logistic regression with year-by-identity interactions to test whether sexual orientation-based disparities widened, narrowed, or were maintained over time.ResultsVictimization risk declined significantly for male and female bisexual and questioning youth, lesbian, gay, and heterosexual youth. Disparities narrowed between bisexual, questioning, and lesbian females and heterosexual females and between bisexual and heterosexual males. Nevertheless, sexual orientation-based disparities remained significant for all sexual minority youth in 2017.ConclusionsDistinct patterns of change in victimization risk for specific groups of sexual minority youth underscore the need to consider variability within sexual minority youth communities; treating them as a singular group could mask nuanced disparities. Some of the relatively small decreases in victimization risk also suggest the need for interventions to address a more comprehensive set of victimization-related risks beyond bullying and needed efforts that are not limited to the immediate school context.