An initial psychometric evaluation of the German PROMIS v1.2 Physical Function item bank in patients with a wide range of health conditions
An initial psychometric evaluation of the German PROMIS v1.2 Physical Function item bank in patients with a wide range of health conditions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0269215517714297
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Nolte, Sandra
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Liegl, Gregor;Rose, Matthias;Nolte, Sandra
目的：将PROMIS身体机能（PF）项目库版本1.2翻译成德语，并调查所产生的完整库和七种衍生简短形式的心理测量特性。设计：横断面心理测量研究。设置：Charite-Universitatsmedizin心身医学系的住院和门诊诊所，柏林，德国。主题：共有10名患有各种慢性疾病的成年患者参加了认知述职访谈。最后的项目银行被管理到n=266成人患者广泛的医疗条件。干预措施：患者报告的结果评估作为常规care.Main措施的一部分：PROMIS v1.2 PF银行; MOS SF-36 PF量表（PF-10）。对于最终的德语翻译，校正后的项目-总相关系数范围为0.44至0.84。各PROMIS PF短型的Cronbach α较高（=0.88-0.96）。完整PROMIS PF库和大多数简短表格与SF-36 PF-10高度相关（r=0.85-0.90），但PROMIS上限（r=0.64）除外。PROMIS的上一致性表现出天花板效应，与其他短形式相比，与全银行的一致性较低。支持所有PROMIS PF措施，使用传统的因素分析和非参数项目反应theory.Conclusion：德国PROMIS PF银行被发现是概念上等同于英文版，并满足心理测量要求，在临床实践中使用的短形式。未来的研究应特别注意上肢功能受限的样本，以进一步研究根据PROMIS概念化的PF的尺寸结构。
Objectives: To translate the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) item bank version 1.2 into German and to investigate psychometric properties of resulting full bank and seven derived short forms.Design: Cross-sectional psychometric study.Setting: Inpatient and outpatient clinics of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine at Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Germany.Subjects: A total of 10 adult patients with various chronic diseases participated in cognitive debriefing interviews. The final item bank was administered to n=266 adult patients with a broad range of medical conditions.Interventions: Patient-reported outcome assessment as part of routine care.Main measures: PROMIS v1.2 PF bank; MOS SF-36 PF scale (PF-10).Results: Cross-cultural adaptation of the item bank followed established guidelines. For the final German translation, the corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.84. Cronbach's alpha was high for each PROMIS PF short form (=0.88-0.96). The full PROMIS PF bank and most short forms correlated highly with the SF-36 PF-10 (r=0.85-0.90), with the exception of PROMIS Upper Extremity (r=0.64). PROMIS Upper Extremity showed ceiling effects and lower agreement with the full bank than other short forms. Unidimensionality was supported for all PROMIS PF measures using traditional factor analysis and nonparametric item response theory.Conclusion: The German PROMIS PF bank was found to be conceptually equivalent to the English version and fulfilled the psychometric requirements for use of short forms in clinical practice. Future studies should pay particular attention to samples with upper extremity functional limitations to further investigate the dimensional structure of PF as conceptualized according to PROMIS.