Social Movements and Organization Theory: INSTITUTIONAL VARIATION IN THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: COMPETING LOGICS AND THE SPREAD OF RECYCLING ADVOCACY GROUPS
Social Movements and Organization Theory: INSTITUTIONAL VARIATION IN THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: COMPETING LOGICS AND THE SPREAD OF RECYCLING ADVOCACY GROUPS
复制标题
社会运动和组织理论：社会运动演变中的制度变异：竞争逻辑和回收倡导团体的传播
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Lounsbury
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Lounsbury
组织和社会运动的学生最近强调了研究组织理论和社会运动文献中的思想和研究发展可以有效地结合在一起以促进知识的方法的潜在成果（Fligstein 1996; Clemens 1997; Davis and McAdam 2000; Rao，莫里尔and Zald 2000）。在本章中，我的目标是通过将研究注意力从两篇文献中突出的制度化研究中转移出来，进一步推动这种异花授粉。社会运动的制度化涉及到将有争议的政治（包括抗议等策略）转变为更传统的政治行动形式，如游说（Meyer and Tarrow 1998）。在组织理论中，制度化通常是指特定类型的实践或形式变得合法并在组织人群中扩散的过程（斯特朗和Soule，1998）。这两篇文献都倾向于援引渐进式变化的形象，重点关注现有的社会结构如何保持稳定和精英地位如何得到复制。最近，一些组织制度主义者已经开始回避制度化的研究，而更多地关注组织核心实践的质的变化如何与更广泛的制度信念相结合（Scott 2001）。制度逻辑的概念已被用来研究这种转变，并强调高阶信仰系统与较低层次的物质实践和惯例之间的相互联系（例如，Friedland 2002）。
Students of organizations and social movements recently have highlighted the potential fruitfulness of examining the ways in which ideas and research developments in the organizational theory and social movement literatures can be usefully brought together to advance knowledge (Fligstein 1996; Clemens 1997; Davis and McAdam 2000; Rao, Morrill and Zald 2000). In this chapter, I aim to push such cross-pollination further by reorienting research attention away from the study of institutionalization that has been prominent in both literatures. The institutionalization of social movements involves the transformation of contentious politics that involve tactics such as protest into more conventional forms of political action such as lobbying (Meyer and Tarrow 1998). In organization theory, institutionalization typically refers to the processes by which particular kinds of practices or forms become legitimate and diffuse throughout organizational populations (Strang and Soule 1998). Both literatures have tended to invoke an imagery of incremental change that focuses on how existing social structures maintain stability and elite positions become reproduced. Recently, some organizational institutionalists have begun to eschew the study of institutionalization and focus more on how qualitative shifts in the core practices of organizations change in tandem with broader institutional beliefs (Scott 2001). The concept of institutional logic has been used to study such shifts and highlight the interconnections between higher order belief systems and lower level material practices and routines (e.g., Friedland 2002).