A REVIEW OF TWO METHODS USED IN THE USA TO ASSESS HE DURING FLUOROSCOPIC-BASED RADIOLOGY
A REVIEW OF TWO METHODS USED IN THE USA TO ASSESS HE DURING FLUOROSCOPIC-BASED RADIOLOGY
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/rpd/ncw006
复制
发表时间：
2016-09-01
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Salasky, Mark R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yoder, R. Craig;Salasky, Mark R.
对进行透视和介入放射学检查的81500人的剂量计结果进行了检查，以确定使用两个剂量计（一个放置在围裙上方的衣领处，另一个放置在躯干上的围裙下方（EDE 1））或使用一个放置在围裙上方的衣领处的单个剂量计（EDE 2）进行监测的组间差异。使用EDE 1方案监测的人群的年H-E中位数为0.17 mSv，使用EDE 2方案监测的人群为0.26 mSv。最常使用的是EDE 2方法，对于暴露程度较高的患者，首选EDE 1方法。大约有22%的EDE 1剂量计结果与基于围裙剂量计上下关系的预期标准不一致。
Dosemeter results for similar to 81 500 people performing fluoroscopic and interventional radiology procedures were examined to identify differences between groups monitored either by using two dosemeters, one placed at the collar above the apron and a second placed under the apron on the torso (EDE1) or by using one single dosemeter placed at the collar above the apron (EDE2). The median annual H-E was 0.17 mSv for those monitored using the EDE1 protocol and 0.26 mSv for the group using the EDE2 protocol. The EDE2 method was used most frequently with the EDE1 method preferred for those more highly exposed. Approximately, 22 % of dosemeter results for EDE1 were inconsistent with expected norms based on over and under apron dosemeter relationships.