Implementing Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation
Implementing Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation
复制标题
实施生产者延伸责任立法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Toktay
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Luyi Gui;A. Atasu;Özlem Ergun;L. Toktay
这篇文章的目的是帮助理解多重的，有时是相互冲突的，利益相关者的观点和普遍的条件（经济，地理等）。在实施地方性上塑造生产者责任延伸（EPR）的“就地”。我们通过一个具体的案例研究，深入探讨了EPR的实施维度，研究了收集和回收系统运营前沿的具体活动，并探讨了推动特定系统现状的不同利益相关者偏好。为此，我们进行了详细的案例研究，华盛顿州电子废物的EPR实施。我们提供了不同的利益相关者的观点和他们的影响，在实践中实现EPR政策目标的概述。这些发现揭示了EPR实施的内在复杂性。最后，我们就如何实现有效和高效的EPR实施，包括改善设计激励措施，纳入再利用和翻新，扩大产品范围，管理下游物流，并通过公平的成本分配设计，提高运营效率的建议。
The goal of this article is to contribute to the understanding of how the multiple, and sometimes conflicting, stakeholder perspectives and prevailing conditions (economic, geographic, etc.) in the implementation locality shape extended producer responsibility (EPR) “on the ground.” We provide an in‐depth examination of the implementation dimension of EPR in a specific case study by examining concrete activities at the operational front of the collection and recycling system, and probing the varying stakeholder preferences that have driven a specific system to its status quo. To this end, we conduct a detailed case study of the Washington State EPR implementation for electronic waste. We provide an overview of various stakeholder perspectives and their implications for the attainment of EPR policy objectives in practice. These findings shed light on the intrinsic complexity of EPR implementation. We conclude with recommendations on how to achieve effective and efficient EPR implementation, including improving design incentives, incorporating reuse and refurbishing, expanding product scope, managing downstream material flows, and promoting operational efficiency via fair cost allocation design.