Low-Noise Stemless PNA Beacons for Sensitive DNA and RNA Detection
Low-Noise Stemless PNA Beacons for Sensitive DNA and RNA Detection
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.200803549
复制
发表时间:
2008-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Seitz, Oliver
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Socher, Elke;Bethge, Lucas;Seitz, Oliver
Fluorescent probes that signal the presence of specific nucleic acids are required in a variety of bioassays, including DNA quantification, SNP typing (SNP= single-nucleotide polymorphism), and analysis of mRNA expression in living cells.[1] The majority of probes take advantage of the distancedependent interaction between two chromophores. Sensitive fluorescent hybridization probes show large hybridizationinduced enhancements of fluorescence emission, which may reach signal-to-background ratios (SBR) on the order of 102.[2] Selective probes enable single-nucleotide-specific fluorescence signaling. Success in both sensitive and specific DNA and RNA detection has been achieved using DNA molecular beacons (MBs, Scheme 1A).[3] These hairpin-shaped probes have been designed to bring the two interacting dyes into close proximity. The SBR is high, because in the absence of target the fluorescence is efficiently quenched by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), collisional quenching, and/or formation of ground-or excited-state complexes. Molecular beacons bind target DNA with high match/mismatch specificity, but only within a certain temperature range that depends on the difference between thermal stabilities of matched and mismatched probe–target complexes.[4] It is, thus, impossible to distinguish matched from mismatched targets at conditions for which both matched and mismatched probe–target complexes co-exist. The major limitation in molecular-beacon design is that features that increase sensitivity are detrimental to the sequence specificity of fluorescence signaling and vice versa. Large fluorescence enhancements can only be obtained when the stem region is readily opened, while high specificity calls for stable stems that resist opening by mismatched hybridization. We envisioned an alternative beacon design. The approach on one hand retains a signaling mechanism used in molecular beacons, wherein two chromophores detect changes of probe conformation, but it omits the requirement for the formation of stable hairpin structures.[5] On the other hand,“smart” labels are used that become fluorescent and initiate FRET to a near-infrared dye only when the donor dye is embedded in perfectly matched base pairs. It is shown that the combination of the two processes, detection of conformational changes by a switch in energy transfer mechanisms and signaling of altered stacking interactions of an intercalator dye, allows for up to 108-fold fluorescence intensification upon hybridization. Importantly, the stemless probes distinguish matched from mismatched targets at virtually any temperature. Homogeneous detection of both DNA and RNA targets is demonstrated. The design approach is illustrated in Scheme1B. An intercalator dye, such as thiazole orange, is introduced as base surrogate in a peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-based probe and used as donor for FRET. A terminally appended nearinfrared (NIR) dye, such as NIR667, serves as acceptor dye. It was expected that excitation of the donor in single-stranded probes would induce negligible emission of the acceptor dye because 1) the donor excited state is rapidly depleted owing to torsional motion around the central methine bridge of unstacked thiazole orange,[6] 2) the NIR667 (acceptor) dye is quenched upon collisions with nucleobases, and 3) intramolecular dye–dye dimers or short-lived collision complexes may form, aided by the tendency of the uncharged, hydrophobic PNA molecule to adopt a collapsed structure inScheme 1. Comparison of A) molecular beacons with B) stemless FIT–PNA beacons in the detection of complementary nucleic acids. In …