Qualitative profiles of disability
Qualitative profiles of disability
复制标题
DOI：
10.1682/jrrd.2004.02.0016
复制
发表时间：
2004-11-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Caltagirone, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Annicchiarico, R;Gibert, K;Caltagirone, C
本研究通过增加残疾程度确定了功能性残疾（FD）的概况。我们使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表II（WHODAS II）评估了96名受试者。在分析中使用了基于规则的聚类（ClBR）（统计学和人工智能的混合技术）。根据残疾程度的增加，对四组具有不同FD特征的受试者进行了排序：“低”，没有身体或情绪问题的独立受试者;“中间I”，具有低或中度身体和情绪残疾的受试者，具有高度的残疾感;“中级II”，中度或重度残疾，仅涉及与自立有关的身体问题，没有情感问题;“高”指身体和情感残疾程度最高的受试者。WHODAS II标准化总体评分的显著差异（< 0.001）决定了四类的顺序。在本文中，一个新的本体论的知识FD，使用ClBR的基础上，提出。四类的定义，定性不同，并与FD的程度增加，有助于适当地将每个病人在一组具有类似的残疾概况的个人，并提出这些群体的标准化治疗。
This study identified profiles of functional disability (FD) paralleled by increasing levels of disability. We assessed 96 subjects using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II). Clustering Based on Rules (ClBR) (a hybrid technique of Statistics and Artificial Intelligence) was used in the analysis. Four groups of subjects with different profiles of FD were ordered according to an increasing degree of disability: "Low," self-dependent subjects with no physical or emotional problems; "Intermediate I," subjects with low or moderate physical and emotional disability, with high perception of disability; "Intermediate II," subjects with moderate or severe disability concerning only physical problems related to self-dependency, without emotional problems; and "High," subjects with the highest degree of disability, both physical and emotional. The order of the four classes is paralleled by a significant difference (< 0.001) in the WHODAS II standardized global score. In this paper, a new ontology for the knowledge of FD, based on the use of ClBR, is proposed. The definition of four classes, qualitatively different and with ail increasing degree of FD, helps to appropriately place each patient in a group of individuals with a similar profile of disability and to propose standardized treatments for these groups.