Revision and Systematic Position of the Blenniid Fishes of the Genus Neoclinus
Revision and Systematic Position of the Blenniid Fishes of the Genus Neoclinus
复制标题
新斜鱼属鲽鱼的修订及系统地位
DOI：
10.2307/1440237
复制
发表时间：
1953
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Hubbs
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Hubbs
我在研究东太平洋的隐床鱼类时，曾修改过新隐床鱼属的鱼类，后来才认识到这些鱼类不是隐床鱼类。现在看来，Neoclinus可归入Blenniidae，更具体地说，可归入Chaenopsinae亚科，在该亚科中，它可被视为构成四个部落之一（Hubbs，1952）。这一概念涉及到以前的作者已经放在几个科属的重新组合。作者感谢乔治·S.作者声明：Margaret H.斯坦福大学的Storey; Chapman和W. I. Follett，来自加州科学院; Hubbs和Boyd W.加州大学的步行者;南加州大学的Garth和Robert R.米勒，前美国国家博物馆。感谢Norman J. Willimovsky在Stathmonotus的工作中提供的帮助，以及对该问题其他方面的有益讨论。乔治S.作者：Carl L.罗尔夫·哈布斯Bolin，and Catherine S.哈布斯阅读并批评了这部作品的草稿。图12由阿尔马W绘制。Froderstrom;其余的图画是格蕾丝·休伊特根据作者的草图绘制的。除了一个例外，本研究中使用的计数和测量方法是Hubbs和Lagler（1941）描述的方法。从脊柱后基底测量脊柱长度。在讨论meristic字符的极端变量-
THE FISHES of the genus Neoclinus were revised by me in connection with my studies on the clinid fishes of the eastern Pacific before it was realized that these fishes are not clinids. It now appears that Neoclinus is referable to the Blenniidae and, more specifically, to the subfamily Chaenopsinae, within which it may be regarded as constituting one of four tribes (Hubbs, 1952). This concept involves a regrouping of genera which previous authors have placed in several families. For permission to examine specimens, the author is indebted to George S. Myers and Margaret H. Storey, of Stanford University; Wilbert M. Chapman and W. I. Follett, of the California Academy of Sciences; Carl L. Hubbs and Boyd W. Walker, of the University of California; John S. Garth, of the University of Southern California; and Robert R. Miller, formerly of the United States National Museum. Thanks are due to Norman J. Wilimovsky for help in the work on Stathmonotus and for helpful discussions on other aspects of the problem. George S. Myers, Carl L. Hubbs, Rolf L. Bolin, and Catherine S. Hubbs have read and criticized drafts of the work. Figure 12 was drawn by Alma W. Froderstrom; the remaining drawings were made by Grace Hewitt, from sketches by the author. With one exception, the methods of counting and measuring used in this investigation have been those described by Hubbs and Lagler (1941). The spine lengths were measured from the posterior base of the spine. In the discussions of meristic characters the extreme varia-