Does home production replace consumption spending? Evidence from shocks in housing wealth in the Great Recession.

Does home production replace consumption spending? Evidence from shocks in housing wealth in the Great Recession.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1162/rest_a_00794
复制
发表时间:
2020-03
期刊:
The review of economics and statistics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hurd M
Hurd M
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Been J;Rohwedder S;Hurd M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

贝克尔的家庭生产理论表明消费支出和家庭生产之间的可替代性。使用面板数据的详细信息的支出和时间使用,我们分析了家庭的能力,以取代消费支出的家庭生产的同行。在大衰退期间,保持工资固定,并通过住房财富的冲击改变终身资源,我们估计了与生命周期贝克尔模型一致的替代弹性。然而,我们估计,只有约11%的总支出是由家庭生产,这与以前的文献相比,使得它不太可能,家庭生产完全减轻财富冲击的后果,以福祉。
Becker’s theory of home production suggests substitutability between consumption spending and home production. Using panel data with detailed information on spending and time use, we analyze house-holds’ ability to replace consumption spending by home produced counterparts. Keeping wages fixed and changing lifetime resources by the shock to housing wealth during the Great Recession we estimate an elasticity of substitution that is consistent with a Life-Cycle Becker model. However, we estimate that only about 11% of total spending is replaceable by home production, which, in contrast to prior literature, makes it unlikely that home production fully mitigates the consequences of wealth shocks to well-being.
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00140
发表时间: 2011-08
期刊: The review of economics and statistics
影响因子: --
作者:
Aguila E;Attanasio O;Meghir C
通讯作者: Meghir C
DOI: 10.2307/2228949
发表时间: 1965-01-01
期刊: ECONOMIC JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
BECKER, GS
通讯作者: BECKER, GS
DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.5.1664
发表时间: 2013-08-01
影响因子: 10.7
作者:
Aguiar, Mark;Hurst, Erik;Karabarbounis, Loukas
通讯作者: Karabarbounis, Loukas
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00323
发表时间: 2013-10-01
影响因子: 8
作者:
Cooper, Daniel
通讯作者: Cooper, Daniel
DOI: 10.1086/262070
发表时间: 1997-02-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Apps, PF;Rees, R
通讯作者: Rees, R