"I've been manipulated!"

"I've been manipulated!"
复制标题

“我被操纵了!”

DOI:
10.1145/3025453.3025833
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Feltwell T
Feltwell T
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Feltwell T

文献摘要

相似文献

最近,一种关注福利领取者的真人秀电视类型的激增导致了人们的担忧,即黄金时段的媒体体验正在加剧误解,并扼杀围绕福利改革和贫困等重大社会问题的关键辩论。出于争论,“第二次筛选”的做法提供了机会,让观众参与政治关注的问题,我们描述了两个智能手机应用程序的设计和评估,促进和促进更关键的真人秀直播观看。我们的应用程序,发现指南和道德指南针,鼓励用户识别,分类,标签和过滤模式和比喻在现实电视,以及重新解释社交媒体帖子与他们的广播。我们表明,这种互动鼓励围绕典型的编辑和制作技术的批判性思维,并促进观众之间的共同讨论和反思。我们讨论,更广泛地说,这些互动如何鼓励用户识别更广泛的后果和电视真人秀的框架,并提供设计的影响和考虑因素,引发批判性和反思,在第二次筛选的情况下。
The recent proliferation of a reality TV genre that focusses on welfare recipients has led to concerns that prime-time media experiences are exacerbating misconceptions, and stifling critical debate, around major societal issues such as welfare reform and poverty. Motivated by arguments that 'second screening' practices offer opportunities to engage viewers with issues of political concern, we describe the design and evaluation of two smartphone apps that facilitate and promote more critical live-viewing of reality TV. Our apps,Spotting GuideandMoral Compass, encourage users to identify, categorise, tag and filter patterns and tropes within reality TV, as well as reinterpret social media posts associated with their broadcast. We show that such interactions encourage critical thinking around typical editing and production techniques and foster co-discussion and reflection amongst viewers. We discuss, more broadly, how these interactions encourage users to identify the wider consequences and framings of reality TV, and offer implications and considerations for design that provokes criticality and reflection in second screening contexts.