From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: A principled spectrum
From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: A principled spectrum
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijar.2018.11.019
复制
发表时间：
2019-02-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Toni, Francesca
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baroni, Pietro;Rago, Antonio;Toni, Francesca
近年来，对论证中的渐进评估方法的性质的研究越来越受到关注，研究致力于各种类别的框架/方法，导致在不同的上下文中概念上相似但形式上不同的性质。在本文中，我们提供了一个新的系统分析，这一研究景观作出三个主要贡献。首先，我们确定组的概念相关的属性在文献中，这可以被视为基于共同的模式，并使用这些模式，我们的证据表明，许多进一步的新属性可以考虑。然后，我们提供了一个简化和统一的角度来看，这些组的属性表明，他们都隐含着新的参数原则（无论是严格或非严格）的平衡和单调性。最后，我们表明，（实例）这些原则（因此，组，文学和新的属性，他们意味着）是满意的几个定量论证形式主义在文献中，从而确认原则的一般有效性和实用性，以支持一个紧凑的，但全面的，逐步论证的属性分析。(C)2018爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
The study of properties of gradual evaluation methods in argumentation has received increasing attention in recent years, with studies devoted to various classes of frameworks/ methods leading to conceptually similar but formally distinct properties in different contexts. In this paper we provide a novel systematic analysis for this research landscape by making three main contributions. First, we identify groups of conceptually related properties in the literature, which can be regarded as based on common patterns and, using these patterns, we evidence that many further novel properties can be considered. Then, we provide a simplifying and unifying perspective for these groups of properties by showing that they are all implied by novel parametric principles of (either strict or nonstrict) balance and monotonicity. Finally, we show that (instances of) these principles (and thus the group, literature and novel properties that they imply) are satisfied by several quantitative argumentation formalisms in the literature, thus confirming the principles' general validity and utility to support a compact, yet comprehensive, analysis of properties of gradual argumentation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.