H. THE CHARACTER OF REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY
H. THE CHARACTER OF REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY
复制标题
H. 区域地理的特征
DOI:
10.1080/00045603909357333
复制
发表时间:
1939
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Hartshorne
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Hartshorne
The development of geography during the past thirty-odd years has been marked by an increasing interest in regional geography. Under the leadership of Vidal in France, of Hettner, Penck, Gradmann, Passarge, and many others in Germany, European geographers gradually shifted away from the concentration on systematic geography, which had been a natural result of the emphasis on universals in all science. Likewise, in this country, the programmatic papers of Barrows and Sauer, however divergent in other respects, agreed in the emphasis on regional studies as the core of geography [208; 2111. Though Pfeifer is correct in noting the similarity of these, the two most influential methodological statements in current American geography, he over-estimates their importance in determining the course of current thought in American geography [109, 96 ff.] by failing to note the major degree to which, like the earlier methodological pronouncements of the presidents of this association, they simply “mirror... geographic opinion in America”[94]. As Platt has pointed out, the roots of the current movement, in particular of the tendency for detailed studies of small areas, reach back to geological field courses before the World War and military mapping during the War. 105 It is neither possible nor necessary to determine even approximately what forces or what individuals have been responsible for this development. Mention should certainly be made of the influence that Bowman, as Director of the American Geographical Society, exerted towards intensive regional studies [cf. 1061. Possibly most important of all has been the personal influence exerted by the group of Midwestern geographers lo41t may be admissable to add that a logical corollary of this situation is to be found in the character of membership of this Association. The relatively large number of specialists from other fields, included as geographers, does not represent the normal overlapping along an actual border line between sciences, but rather the fact that geography, by cutting through the systematic sciences, in a sense includes all of them.