Domination in Organizational Fields: It’s Just Not Cricket
Domination in Organizational Fields: It’s Just Not Cricket
复制标题
组织领域的统治：这不是板球运动
DOI：
10.1177/1350508409337582
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
A. Wright
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Wright
本文论证了深入接触布尔迪厄的这一领域理论如何丰富了对制度过程的学术理解。本文对英格兰一级郡板球作为一个受限的文化生产领域的制度形成和变迁进行了历史叙述。该叙述说明了如何将注意力集中在代理人在领域内的位置、领域内的生产关系以及包括社会阶层在内的社会背景上，为分析动态的、多层次的和微妙的制度过程提供了一条途径。布迪厄将场域视为为改善场域地位而谋划的代理人之间的资本斗争的概念，阐明了社会阶级对制度进程的重要性，在现有文献中，最流行的制度化方法对这一影响一直没有得到充分的报道。
This article demonstrates how deep engagement with Bourdieu’s theory of the field enriches scholarly understanding of institutional processes. A historical narrative of institutional formation and change in firstclass County cricket in England as a field of restricted cultural production is presented. The narrative illustrates how focusing attention on the position of agents within the field, the relations of production within the field, and the social context, which includes social class, provides a path for analysis of institutional processes which is dynamic, multi-level and nuanced. Bourdieu’s conception of fields as a struggle for capital between agents strategizing to improve field position illuminates the importance of social class to institutional processes, an effect that has been under reported by the most popular approaches to institutionalization in the extant literature.