Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe

Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe
复制标题

DOI:
10.1162/glep_a_00375
复制
发表时间:
2016-11-01
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Goldthau, Andreas;Sovacool, Benjamin K.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了保加利亚、波兰和罗马尼亚关于页岩气的相互竞争的解释框架。在俄罗斯作为主要天然气供应国的背景下,这些国家面临着将页岩气作为一种潜在的革命性国内能源的选择。这使得它们成为研究政策叙事和话语如何围绕新技术融合的有趣案例。研究结果基于66个半结构化的研究访谈,指出了不同的、实际上是相互竞争的框架,从国家安全、环境福利到经济出卖和威权主义,不同的机构共享这些框架。这表明,通过部署页岩气水力压裂等新能源技术来加强能源安全,不仅仅是资源禀赋和技术进步的作用。相反,它是社会利益相关者之间展开的复杂动态和相关话语过程的结果,最终将决定页岩气是否会走向全球。
This article explores competing interpretive frames regarding shale gas in Bulgaria, Poland, and Romania. These countries face the choice of embracing shale gas as a potential revolutionizing domestic source of energy, against the backdrop of Russia serving as the dominant gas supplier. This makes them interesting cases for studying how policy narratives and discourses coalesce around a novel technology. The findings, which are based on sixty-six semistructured research interviews, point to differing and indeed competing frames, ranging from national security, environmental boons to economic sellout and authoritarianism, with different sets of institutions sharing those frames. This suggests that enhancing energy security by way of deploying novel energy technologies such as shale gas fracking is not simply a function of resource endowments and technological progress. Instead, it is the result of complex dynamics unfolding among social stakeholders and the related discursive processes, which eventually will determine whetheror notshale gas will go global.