The homeostatic psyche: Freudian theory and somatic markers
The homeostatic psyche: Freudian theory and somatic markers
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jphysparis.2010.08.006
复制
发表时间：
2010-11-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Magistretti, Pierre
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arminjon, Mathieu;Ansermet, Francois;Magistretti, Pierre
经过多年的相互缺乏兴趣（如果不是反对的话），神经科学和精神分析准备重新进行对话。本文讨论了弗洛伊德元心理学的某些方面及其与特定生物机制的联系。它特别强调了稳态的生理学概念如何与精神分析的某些基本概念产生共鸣。同样，作者强调了弗洛伊德和达马西奥的大脑功能理论如何表现出显着的互补性，特别是通过他们共同引用梅纳特和詹姆斯。此外，根据当前神经可塑性和痕迹形成及其与稳态过程的关系的神经生物学证据，讨论了弗洛伊德的驱力理论。痕迹和稳态之间随之而来的动态开辟了新的途径，根据每个主题独特的幻想的建立来思考内心生活。在决定论的背景下，可塑性和重新巩固所暗示的决定论的缺乏参与了奇点的出现、独特性的创造和主体不可预测的未来。生物学本身固有的决定论存在缺陷。独特性和不连续性：这应该是今天神经科学提出的问题的焦点。神经科学需要建立“不连续”生物学的新基础。精神分析可以为神经科学提供思考不连续性的可能性。因此，神经科学和精神分析在不连续性方面以意想不到的方式相遇，这是它们之间的一个新的交汇点。 (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
After years of reciprocal lack of interest, if not opposition, neuroscience and psychoanalysis are poised for a renewed dialogue. This article discusses some aspects of the Freudian metapsychology and its link with specific biological mechanisms. It highlights in particular how the physiological concept of homeostasis resonates with certain fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Similarly, the authors underline how the Freud and Damasio theories of brain functioning display remarkable complementarities, especially through their common reference to Meynert and James. Furthermore, the Freudian theory of drives is discussed in the light of current neurobiological evidences of neural plasticity and trace formation and of their relationships with the processes of homeostasis. The ensuing dynamics between traces and homeostasis opens novel avenues to consider inner life in reference to the establishment of fantasies unique to each subject. The lack of determinism, within a context of determinism, implied by plasticity and reconsolidation participates in the emergence of singularity, the creation of uniqueness and the unpredictable future of the subject. There is a gap in determinism inherent to biology itself. Uniqueness and discontinuity: this should today be the focus of the questions raised in neuroscience. Neuroscience needs to establish the new bases of a "discontinuous" biology. Psychoanalysis can offer to neuroscience the possibility to think of discontinuity. Neuroscience and psychoanalysis meet thus in an unexpected way with regard to discontinuity and this is a new point of convergence between them. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.