"Discredited" Versus "Discreditable": Understanding How Shared and Unique Stigma Mechanisms Affect Psychological and Physical Health Disparities.
"Discredited" Versus "Discreditable": Understanding How Shared and Unique Stigma Mechanisms Affect Psychological and Physical Health Disparities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01973533.2012.746612
复制
发表时间：
2013-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Andel S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaudoir SR;Earnshaw VA;Andel S
被污名化的人是否认为他的不同之处已为人所知或当场明显，或者他是否认为在场的人既不知道也不能立即察觉到？在第一种情况下，一个人处理的是声名狼藉的人的困境，第二个情况是处理声名狼藉的人的困境。这是一个重要的区别。在他的经典论文中，他描绘了那些名誉扫地的人和那些名誉扫地的人之间的界限，前者的耻辱是显而易见的，后者的耻辱是未知的，可以隐藏的。关于隐蔽性对污名管理策略和结果的影响，过去50年的研究在多大程度上推进了戈夫曼的原创思想？在这篇文章中，我们勾勒出一个框架，阐明污名如何“深入皮下”，从而导致心理和身体健康差异。此外，我们考虑隐蔽性何时以及在多大程度上缓和了这些影响，为不可信和不可信的人创造了不同的结果。
Does the stigmatized individual assume his differentness is known about already or is evident on the spot, or does he assume it is neither known about by those present nor immediately perceivable by them? In the first case one deals with the plight of the discredited, in the second with that of the discreditable. This is an important difference. In his classic treatise, delineates between people who are discredited—whose stigma is clearly known or visible—and people who are discreditable—whose stigma is unknown and can be concealable. To what extent has research in the past 50 years advanced Goffman’s original ideas regarding the impact of concealability on stigma management strategies and outcomes? In the current article, we outline a framework that articulates how stigma can “get under the skin” in order to lead to psychological and physical health disparities. Further, we consider when and to what degree concealability moderates these effects, creating divergent outcomes for the discredited and discreditable.