Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the Echr
Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the Echr
复制标题
灌输、世俗主义、宗教自由和 Echr
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Sylvie Langlaude
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sylvie Langlaude
欧洲人权法院大法庭在对Leyla Zahin诉土耳其一案的判决中，再次探讨了宗教在欧洲公约体系中的地位。法院审理两类案件。第一个问题侧重于个人，但对国家与宗教社区之间的关系产生影响。法院在这些案件中更加注重个人主义，因为它更加注重个人和保护他人的权利和自由。法院强调防止灌输、中立、世俗主义和世俗主义等价值观，特别是与伊斯兰教有关的价值观。法院试图促进和执行世俗主义的规范秩序，但这对宗教自由产生了不幸的后果。第二个问题涉及规范宗教事务的整个国内制度是否符合《公约》，包括法律的人格和登记、领导权和财产所有权、国家保护宗教社区不受第三方侵害的积极义务以及宗教选择自由等问题。其目的是促进容忍、宗教多样性、多元化和宗教信仰市场。我们将会看到，判例法中的这两条线索并不总是和谐地结合在一起。
With its judgment in Leyla Şahin v Turkey,1 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has once again addressed the place of religion within the European Convention system. The Court considers two types of cases. The first focuses on individuals but has repercussions on the relationship between State and religious communities. The Court is much more individualistic in these cases, in that it focuses more on the individual and the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. The Court emphasizes values such as the prevention of indoctrination, neutrality, secularism and laïcité, especially in relation to Islam. The Court tries to promote and enforce a normative order of secularism but this has unfortunate consequences for religious freedom. The second deals with the compatibility of entire domestic regimes regulating religious affairs with the Convention, including questions of legal personality and registration, leadership and property ownership, positive obligations of the State towards the protection of religious communities against third parties, and freedom of religious choice. The aim is to promote tolerance, religious diversity, pluralism and a market place within religious beliefs. It will be shown that these two strands in the caselaw do not always sit happily together.