Qualitative Research, Reflexivity and Living with Risk: Valuing and Practicing Epistemic Reflexivity and Centering Marginality

Qualitative Research, Reflexivity and Living with Risk: Valuing and Practicing Epistemic Reflexivity and Centering Marginality
复制标题

定性研究、反身性和与风险共存:重视和实践认知反身性和集中边缘性

DOI:
10.1080/14780880701863575
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
19
通讯作者:
K. Henwood
K. Henwood
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Henwood

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Please try later.
In qualitative research, marginality and reflexivity are often closely interwoven. An emic research strategy has provided major stimuli to qualitative psychological investigations. In light of questions posed about conceptualizing marginality, discussion has progressed. A range of ways of practicing epistemic reflexivity now help guard against the idea of any one researcher stance, method or form of inquiry guaranteeing knowledge via unmediated perception. The article espouses the proliferation within qualitative psychology of a range of potentially useful practices. Engaging reflexively with the question of when to centre marginality can be a strategy for attending to emotive forms of data and taking analysis in unexpected directions.