Making methods sociable: dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research
Making methods sociable: dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research
复制标题
使方法具有社交性：定性研究中的对话、伦理和作者身份
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Back
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shamser Sinha;L. Back
本文主张在定性研究中培养社交形式的对话。传统研究都强调通过司法和侵入性国家调查模式提取叙述，而不是从参与者和研究人员之间真正的双向对话中学习。通过对年轻移民的研究，我们展示了让参与者作为分析性对话的观察者和塑造者如何能够产生跨越研究人员和参与者的理解视野的交流循环。这产生了超越定性调查限制的新见解，从参与者那里提取信息，并且这样做有可能影响感知的转变，从而激发和吸引体验。它对重新思考分享、信任和明确责任的作者身份产生了影响。开发这种方法反对定性研究文化的“道德疑病症”，即“自动匿名”限制了研究传播、联系人们和激发公众想象力的潜力。
The article argues for fostering sociable forms of dialogue in qualitative research. Conventional research shares an emphasis on extracting narratives with judicial and invasive state modes of enquiry rather than on learning from a genuine two-way dialogue between participants and researchers. Using a study of young migrants, we show how involving participants as observers and shapers of analytical dialogue can produce circulations of communication oscillating across the researcher’s and participant’s horizons of understanding. This produces new insight, beyond the limits of qualitative investigation, that extracts information from participants, and in so doing, has the potential to affect shifts in perception that animate and enchant experience. It has consequences for rethinking authorship that share, credit and specify responsibility. Developing such an approach opposes the ‘ethical hypochondria’ characterising qualitative research culture, where ‘automatic anonymity’ is limiting the potential of research to travel, connect people and engage the public imagination.