the Human Embr y onic Stem Cell Debate
the Human Embr y onic Stem Cell Debate
复制标题
人类胚胎干细胞争论
DOI：
10.7551/mitpress/3595.001.0001
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
M. Mahowald
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Mahowald
EDIA的生物技术进展报告教育了大量的非科学家关于生物学术语和过程，他们以前对此知之甚少或兴趣不大。提供这些报道的记者本身对科学的理解程度各不相同;此外，他们准确和清楚地传达有关信息的能力也各不相同。通常，当所报道的问题在伦理上存在争议时，记者会寻求新一代学者的意见，即“生物伦理学家”。由于生物伦理学家通常在生物科学以外的学科中接受培训，他们往往对所处理问题的基础科学只有肤浅的知识。即使是那些临床医生也可能缺乏对相关基础科学的深刻或复杂的理解。一些生物伦理学家显然在这方面比其他人做了更多的功课;那些观点在科学上最可信的人通过利用相关和
EDIA REPORTS OF ADVANCES in biotechnology have educated vast numbers of non-scientists about biological terms and processes about which they previously had little knowledge or interest. Journalists who provide these reports have varying degrees of scientific understanding themselves; in addition, they differ in their ability to communicate the relevant information accurately and clearly. Frequently, when the issue covered is ethically debatable, journalists seek the opinions of a new breed of academics, the “bioethicists.” Because bioethicists are usually trained in disciplines other than the biological sciences, they often have only superficial knowledge of the science that underlies the issues addressed. Even those who are clinicians may lack deep or sophisticated understanding of relevant basic science. Some bioethicists obviously do more homework in this regard than others; and those whose views are scientifically most credible earn that credibility by utilizing pertinent and
影响因子：
158.5
作者：
Freed, CR;Greene, PE;Fahn, S
通讯作者：
Fahn, S