Bushmeat consumption and possible risks to consumers in Thailand
Bushmeat consumption and possible risks to consumers in Thailand
复制标题
DOI:
10.3920/978-90-8686-238-2_7
复制
发表时间:
2014-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Paulsen, Peter
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Awaiwanont, Nattakarn;Pongsopawijit, Pornsawan;Paulsen, Peter
According to national legislation, the Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, hunting of 'reserved' or 'protected' species is considered illegal in Thailand. Major factors driving illegal hunting and trading of wildlife for supplying the local (and international) market are the rapid growth of the Thai population together with the development of transportation and promotion of tourism, high income travellers willing to pay high prices for illicit hunting of rare, protected species, while it is widely believed among rural people that eating bushmeat will enhance good health and increase lifespan. These illegal hunting activities and trades mostly occur at the boundaries between communities and wildlife sanctuaries or national parks and the border areas between Thailand and neighbouring countries. Limited data on bushmeat quality and the quantity of bushmeat consumption are available. People in rural areas are still unaware that bushmeat may transfer zoonotic diseases. Some believe that consuming alcoholic drinks together with uncooked meat would kill pathogens and hence would make it safe for consumption. Wild boar meat is the most common bushmeat among local people. Several risks for human diseases have been reported such as Streptococcus suis, Brucella suis and Trichinella spp. (Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae). Other risks from bushmeat are eosinophilic meningitis caused by infection with Angiostrongylus cantonensis transmitted from yellow tree monitors (Varanus bengalensis), and known and unknown zoonotic diseases from non-human primates species. Underreporting may be motivated by the fact that bushmeat hunting is illegal, and that the exposed people live in rural communities with lack of knowledge and less accessibility to health care units. Thus, it is more realistic to raise awareness of the benefits of safe meat handling and processing than to expect that (illegal) hunting will decline.