Ultrasound screening in gynecological examinations: can we overcome the criticism that it is insufficient and harmful?
Ultrasound screening in gynecological examinations: can we overcome the criticism that it is insufficient and harmful?
复制标题
妇科检查中的超声筛查:我们能否克服其不足和有害的批评?
DOI:
10.1007/s10396-021-01174-3
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Naruse Katsuhiko
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ryoko Asano;Mikiko Asai-Sato;Taichi Mizushima;Etsuko Miyagi.;Naruse Katsuhiko
Ultrasound is performed simultaneously with vaginal cytology in many facilities during examinations focused on gynecologic tumors. Traditionally, we have relied on the pelvic examination (bimanual palpation), but its accuracy has not been high, and the influence of certain factors, such as the patient’s body mass index, have been unavoidable [1]. In addition, widespread use of transvaginal ultrasonography has improved the detection of ovarian tumors and uterine fibroids.On the other hand, it has been observed that routine ultrasonography for the detection of ovarian and uterine endometrial cancers is not entirely relevant, does not contribute to mortality reduction, is not valid, and may lead to overdiagnosis [2]. We should be aware that there is no consensus on the use of ultrasound in gynecological examinations. This is probably because of the limited ability of ultrasound diagnosis to determine whether ovarian tumors are benign or malignant and because a pathological diagnosis cannot be confirmed without operative histology. In addition, the goal of a screening test should be early detection to reduce the risk of disease and improve prognosis. However, thus far, ultrasound screening of ovarian cancer has not been able to improve outcomes, which may be due to its refractoriness [2]. On the other hand, endometrial cancer progresses slowly, and the prognosis is not so poor even when detected later based on other subjective symptoms, which is thought to reduce the priority of using ultrasonography for screening of asymptomatic individuals.